. Enquête sur l'école, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1916. idgeport Camorfdge 369 283 3,29 17 560 508 5,14 : 4 506 452 4,15 11 Dayton Des Moines 684 150 7,26 1 515 325 4,16 10 Fall River GRAND RAPIDS 628 924 5,21 386 522 4,22 3 Kansas City 8 437 987 3,98 13 Lowell Lynn 386 355 4,02 12 Memphis.. :. : 475 922 3,39 15 387 357 3,40 14 , Nashville New Bedford 475 445 578 864 4.4L 6 Paterson 4,38 7 385 181 2,89 18 Richmond San Antonio 366 618 3,31 16 621 733 4,49 5 Blueberry - Springfield, 689 998 7,07 2 * Les données de l'U.S. Bureau of Census, Bulletin n° 126, p. 22. 376 Enquête sur l'école, Grand Rapids, Michigan ids

• Contributeur: The Reading Room / Alamy Banque D'Images
• ID de l’image: 2AG8RFD
• Taille du fichier: 7,1 MB (792,8 KB Téléchargement compressé)
• Autorisations: Modèle - non | Propriété - non
• Dimensions: 1441 x 1734 px | 24,4 x 29,4 cm | 9,6 x 11,6 inches | 150dpi

Informations supplémentaires

Cette image appartient au domaine public, ce qui signifie que le droit d’auteur a expiré ou que le titulaire du droit d’auteur a renoncé à ses droits. Les frais facturés par Alamy couvrent l’accès à la copie haute résolution de l’image.

Cette image peut avoir des imperfections car il s’agit d’une image historique ou de reportage.

. School survey, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1916. idgeport 369, 283 3.29 17 Camorfdge : 560, 508 5.14 4 Dayton 506, 452 4.15 11 Des Moines 684, 150 7.26 1 Fall River 515, 325 4.16 10 GRAND RAPIDS 628, 924 5.21 3 Kansas City 386, 522 4.22 8 Lowell 437, 987 3.98 13 Lynn 386, 355 4.02 12 Memphis..:.: 475, 922 3.39 15 Nashville , 387, 357 3.40 14 New Bedford 475, 445 4.4l 6 Paterson 578, 864 4.38 7 Richmond 385, 181 2.89 18 San Antonio 366, 618 3.31 16 Scranton - 621, 733 4.49 5 Springfield, Mass 689, 998 7.07 2 * Data from U. S. Bureau of Census, Bulletin No. 126, p. 22. 376 SCHOOL SURVEY, GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN ids is spending more money on schools in proportion to its capa-city for doing so than the average city in the group. It is in theupper third, ranking sixth in 19 cities in expenditure per $1, 000of real wealth, although it ranks ninth in estimated real wealthper inhabitant. Furthermore, in proportion to its capacity, it isspending more than twice as much as the cities ranking 17th, 18thand 19th in the list, and practically the same amount as the. DIAGRAM LXXX—Expenditures per inhabitant for 19 cities. COST OF PUBLIC EDUCATION 377 cities ranking 3rd, 4th and 5th. The city is a leader in the de-gree to which it is taxing its capacity to support schools. TABLE LXVII Expenditures for School Purposes per $1, 000.00 of Real Wealth;Rank of 19 Cities. 1913*. Estimated Expenditures Real per $1000 • Valuation Total Expenditures of Real WealthL11» Population of Propertyt for Schools Amount Rank Des Moines 94, 238 87, 887, 532 684, 150 7.78 1 Scranton 138, 621 101, 944, 538 621.733 6.10 2 Paterson 132, 236 101, 993, 413 578, 864 5.68 3 Fall River 123, 982 97, 935, 957 515, 325 5.26 4 kSXe-!!, v5.- 109, 885 84, 792, 243 437, 987 5.17 5 GRAND RAPIDS 120, 695 124, 313, 651 628, 924 5.06 6 Cambridge 109, 045 115, 947, 300 560, 508 4.84 7 Lynn 96, 099 81, 529, 354 386, 355 4.74 8 New Bedford 107, 766 101, 744, 559 475, 445 4.67 9 Springfield 97, 654 151, 960, 100 689, 998 4.54 10 Kansas City 91, 687 90, 367, 010 386, 522 4.28 11 Nashvil

Recherche dans la banque de photos par tags

• bookcentury1900
• bookdecade1910
• livresubjecteducationalsurveys