La Tête de Femme de profil vers la gauche. Artiste : disciple de Léonard de Vinci (Italien, Vinci Amboise (1452-1519), Sebastien ?). Dimensions : hors tout : 5 x 4 3/16 in. (13.2 x 10.2 cm). Date : 1490-1500. La conception de cette tête de femme très cultivée (probablement destiné à représenter la Vierge) s'accorde bien avec celle de la controversée paiting de la 'Madonna Litta" (Musée de l'Ermitage, Saint-Pétersbourg), dont un certain nombre de critiques jugées par Léonard lui-même, mais qui est actuellement considéré comme le plus souvent, si pas entièrement le travail d'un élève ou disciple ; un c

• Contributeur: Album / Alamy Banque D'Images
• ID de l’image: PB3MR1
• Taille du fichier: 39 MB (1,5 MB Téléchargement compressé)
• Autorisations: Modèle - non | Propriété - non
• Dimensions: 3279 x 4157 px | 27,8 x 35,2 cm | 10,9 x 13,9 inches | 300dpi
• Photographe: Album

Informations supplémentaires

Cette image peut avoir des imperfections car il s’agit d’une image historique ou de reportage.

The Head of a Woman in Profile Facing Left. Artist: Follower of Leonardo da Vinci (Italian, Vinci 1452-1519 Amboise) (Giovanni Antonio Boltraffio?). Dimensions: Overall: 5 3/16 x 4 in. (13.2 x 10.2 cm). Date: 1490-1500. The design of this greatly cropped female head (intended presumably to represent the Virgin) accords well with that of the controversial paiting of the "Madonna Litta" (State Hermitage Museum, Saint Petersburg), which a number of early critics thought to be by Leonardo himself, but which is presently considered to be mostly, if not entirely the work of a pupil or follower; a convincing attribution to Giovanni Antonio Boltraffio has been advanced by Pietro C. Marani, while David A. Brown has tended to ascribe it to Marco D'Oggiono, both men being documented in Leonardo's studio in 1490. Independently from the questions regarding the painting, the attribution of the fragmentary Metropolitan Museum sheet accords perfectly well with the production of Leonardo's pupils in Milan in the 1490s, and does not date from a later period as has been suggested; typical are the technique of metalpoint on blue-gray, the drawing style with uniform hatching, and the figural type. In the present author's opinion, the drawing is closest to the hand of Giovanni Antonio Boltraffio; while the study does not appear to exhibit Boltraffio's precise quality of execution, the perceived problem of quality may have to do with the abraded condition of the drawing surface. The sheet is of distinguished British provenance (Sir Peter Lely; the Earls of Pembroke; Pembroke sale, 1917), but was erroneously published and illustrated by Francesco Malaguzzi Valeri (La Corte di Lodovico Il Moro, Milan, 1917, vol. 3, p. 70, Fig. 55) as being in the "Galleria, Naples, " causing relative confusion in the literature, and with an unconvincing attribution to Bernardino de'Conti. The Museum's drawing was remounted in 1980, or thereabouts, to reflect the fact that the head of the female figure w

Recherche dans la banque de photos par tags

• 13,2 10,2 cm
• 1452-1519
• 1490-1500
• 15 15th xv xvth fifteenth century
• 2nd millennium a d
• 5 3/16 x 4
• amboise
• coverall
• dess in
• xv siècle