. Les canneberges ; : la canneberge national magazine. La canneberge. titulaire. Ce qui est considéré comme protec- tion à partir de la concurrence ruineuse par le producteur de lait est considéré comme abusif par l'amélioration des prix con- sumer. Cela, bien sûr, soulève la question très collant quand il s'agit de l'évaluation de programmes tels que le lait des décrets qui va faire l'évaluation ? L'évaluation faite sur la base d'un point de vue ou sans enquête complète de tous les aspects de la question ne peut que servir à élargir les malentendus qui existent. Sommes-nous de jouer à la roulette russe avec l'agriculture américaine ? Sommes-nous pointant le p

• Contributeur: The Book Worm / Alamy Banque D'Images
• ID de l’image: RE693P
• Taille du fichier: 7,1 MB (205,3 KB Téléchargement compressé)
• Autorisations: Modèle - non | Propriété - non
• Dimensions: 1845 x 1354 px | 31,2 x 22,9 cm | 12,3 x 9 inches | 150dpi

Informations supplémentaires

Cette image appartient au domaine public, ce qui signifie que le droit d’auteur a expiré ou que le titulaire du droit d’auteur a renoncé à ses droits. Les frais facturés par Alamy couvrent l’accès à la copie haute résolution de l’image.

Cette image peut avoir des imperfections car il s’agit d’une image historique ou de reportage.

. Cranberries; : the national cranberry magazine. Cranberries. holder. What is viewed as protec- tion from ruinous competition by the dairy farmer is viewed as undue price-enhancement by the con- sumer. This, of course, raises the very sticky question when it comes to evaluation of programs such as milk orders-who is going to do the evaluating? Evaluation made on the basis of a one-sided point of view or without full investigation of all sides of the issue can only serve to widen the misunderstandings which exist. Are we playing Russian roulette with American agriculture? Are we pointing the proverbial gun, with one bullet in the chamber, at the heads of the American farmer and the American consumer? As you know, the wheat farmer depends on a strong export market, since the United States can con- sume only about one-third of a normal wheat crop here at home. A free market for exports is critical to sustaining the farmer's income. that's what it did, urging farmers to go for full production, and then impairing their ability to market their crop and recoup their invest- ment. What Next? Today, farmers and their bank- ers must wonder, where will the next embargo be imposed? On corn? Soybeans? Beet7 This year? Who knows? Donald Wilson recently appointed administrator of USDA 's Agricultural Marketing Service Just five years ago, the free market was restored to much of agriculture. The Agricultural Act of 1970 discontinued acreage allot- ments and marketing quotas for wheat, feed grains and some cotton. And as a result, many farmers for the first time competed in a free market to sell to the highest bidder. The federal government then encouraged "full production" to meet food needs here and overseas. The prospect for increasing farm income looked brighter than it had in years. Prediction It is not difficult to imagine what will happen if the farmer fears his export market will be closed off. The farmer will reduce produc- tion. There will be less supply, in the

Recherche dans la banque de photos par tags

• bookcentury1900
• bookspons