. Les fleuristes [microforme] examen. La floriculture. •-"L^^^-''ff.}. 8 MABCH, 1922, l'examen pour fleuristes 25 L'HSHsasasHSHsasHSHSHSHSHSHSEsasHSHsasHSHSESEsasasasHSZSHSHSHSHsasHsasHsasasai aujourd'hui compte tenu de CANNAS 5lESE5E52S2SHSH5HSa5HSESa HSHSHSH55H5BSHSHSE5H52SESZ5ESHSH HSHSHSHSHSH HSESHSSSH55"j'inBtallment la première de cet article, paru dans La revue pour le 2 mars sous le titre, "Prise d'aujourd'hui de chasse (Cannas, cnnas" traitée à partir d'un point de vue de leur (iilture, la sélection de sol, la meth- (i.i-^ requis pour en assurer le succès, etc., et décrites quelques-unes des meilleures va

• Contributeur: Library Book Collection / Alamy Banque D'Images
• ID de l’image: RRC1R7
• Taille du fichier: 7,2 MB (215,8 KB Téléchargement compressé)
• Autorisations: Modèle - non | Propriété - non
• Dimensions: 1208 x 2069 px | 20,5 x 35 cm | 8,1 x 13,8 inches | 150dpi

Informations supplémentaires

Cette image appartient au domaine public, ce qui signifie que le droit d’auteur a expiré ou que le titulaire du droit d’auteur a renoncé à ses droits. Les frais facturés par Alamy couvrent l’accès à la copie haute résolution de l’image.

Cette image peut avoir des imperfections car il s’agit d’une image historique ou de reportage.

. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. •-"w^'^-'^'ff.}. MABCH 8, 1922 The Florists' Review 25 L'HSHsasasHSHsasHSHSHSHSHSHSEsasHSHsasHSHSESEsasasasHSZSHSHSHSHsasHsasHsasasai CONSIDERING TODAY'S CANNAS 5lESE5E52S2SHSH5HSa5HSESa5HSHSHSH5H5BSHSHSE5H52SESZ5ESHSH5HSESHSSSH5HSHSHSHSHSH"i THE first inBtallment of this article, which appeared in The Review for March 2 under the title, "Taking (Hunt of Today's Cannas, " dealt with cnnas from a point of view of their (iilture, the selection of soil, the meth- (i.i-^ required for success, etc., and de- scribed some of the best varieties in whites, pinks and bronze-leaved pinks. The discussion is here concluded and (I'iils with cannas of still other colors, tlic first of which is the yellow canna. I have long hoped that the day would iiome when we might have a good yellow cnnna. Possibly no variety did so much to popularize the canna as Florence Vaughan, which is classed as yellow, in spite of the fact that it is spotted with red. Although this variety should have been discarded long ago, it is still grown widely, and its production of bloom and brilliancy of color cannot be gainsaid. Many yellow cannas have been intro- duced since the advent of Florence Vaughan, but all of them have shown notable weaknesses. Either the petals are fragile and break in the wind, they sun-scald, or some other notable weak- ness is evident. When Buttercup was in- troduced I hoped a good yellow canna had appeared, and in some respects this was true, but on the whole it proved a disappointment. Queen Helen, the yellow King Humbert, which was introduced a few years ago has already become popular and possibly it is the best of the generally known yellow cannas today, but this variety is also speckled like the old Florence Vaughan, and is too fragile. Richard Wallace, which was introduced a number of years ago, is, perhaps, still the best solid yellow canna that is plenti- ful enough for general planting. Golden Gate. For a t

Recherche dans la banque de photos par tags

• bookcentury1900
• bookdecad
• booksubjectfloriculture
• bookyear1912