Martin Luther : le héros de la réforme 1483-1546 / par Henry Eyster Jacobs . n séparant de cette Église. Nay, pire c'est le plus devrait oneadhérer à lui. Aucun péché ou mal ne peut être imaginé, pour lequel les liens de l'amour devraient être suned et l'unité spirituelle divisée. Mais pour ce qui est du pouvoir et de la sov-étrangère du Siège romain, et pour ce qui est de sa portée, les acquis doivent décider. Tel était la présentation de l'affaire faite par Luther dans l'accomplissement de sa promesse à Miltitz. Mais les efforts du nuncio papal étaient infructueux. Début mai, il invita Luther à Co-blentz, où th

• Contributeur: The Reading Room / Alamy Banque D'Images
• ID de l’image: 2AXA6TM
• Taille du fichier: 7,1 MB (424,9 KB Téléchargement compressé)
• Autorisations: Modèle - non | Propriété - non
• Dimensions: 1307 x 1912 px | 22,1 x 32,4 cm | 8,7 x 12,7 inches | 150dpi

Informations supplémentaires

Cette image appartient au domaine public, ce qui signifie que le droit d’auteur a expiré ou que le titulaire du droit d’auteur a renoncé à ses droits. Les frais facturés par Alamy couvrent l’accès à la copie haute résolution de l’image.

Cette image peut avoir des imperfections car il s’agit d’une image historique ou de reportage.

Martin Luther : the hero of the reformation 1483-1546 / by Henry Eyster Jacobs . n separating fromthis Church. Nay, the worse it is the more should oneadhere to it. No sin or evil can be imagined, for thesake of which the bonds of love should be sundered andspiritual unity divided. But as to the power and sov-ereignty of the Roman See, and as to how far it extends, the learned must decide. Such was the presentation of the case made byLuther in fulfilment of his promise to Miltitz. But the efforts of the papal nuncio were fruitless.At the beginning of May he invited Luther to Co-blentz, where the Archbishop of Treves would hearthe case; but, in the absence of an invitation fromthe Archbishop himself, and of any approval of thepropositions of Miltitz by the Pope, he declined totake it into consideration. Another barrier was thepresence of Cajetan, whom Luther regarded as dis-qualified from any participation in the arbitration, since he had prejudged the case at Augsburg. Idoubt, writes Luther, ** whether he be a CatholicChristian. A later attempt, in October, to bring. DR. JOHN ECK. TRADITIONAL PORTRAIT. I5I9] The Leipzig Disputation 129 Luther before the Archbishop at Liebenwerda failedby the absolute prohibition of the Elector afterLuther had responded that he was ready. Circumstances had changed. The agreement ofmutual silence awaiting an arbitration had beenbroken by the champions of the Papacy. Two habitual agitators, both fond of controversyand ambitious of fame, one on the side of Romeand the other on the side of Luther, Eck and Carl-stadt, could not be suppressed. With Luther, Eckscontroversy had ceased with the latters apology;and, as neither had published his paper, therewas no reason for its renewal. But Carlstadt, whohad changed from an unfriendly critic to a radicaland injudicious advocate of Luthers course, hadposted up theses attacking Eck, which occasionedmuch irritation and wrangling. Eck proposed apublic discussion, and Carlstadt eagerly assented.Luthe

Recherche dans la banque de photos par tags

• bookcentury1900
• bookdecade1900